Animal Face lab report

About half of Animal Face flower tests reached 25% or more: 47% of 335 tests hit that level, while 81% reached 20% or more and 8.1% reached 30% or more.¹

Among the 3 states with at least 30 tests, Maryland had 100% of 43 tests at or above 20% and a 30.47% median, while Michigan had 71% of 108 and a 22.97% median.¹ The gap also reflects each state's growers, labs and testing rules, not just the plant.

SeedFinder's 20–30% range covers the largest share of Animal Face tests, 73%; the lone single THC figure from Leafly gives 30%, which only 8.1% of tests reached, above the 24.49% lab median.^1,3,4

The three range claims covered very different slices of the lab set: 20–30% from SeedFinder contained 73% of tests, while 25–30% from Weedmaps contained 39%.^1,3,5

These comparisons do not identify any specific jar; the relevant number for a purchase is the batch certificate of analysis.

No: Animal Face was rarely led by β-myrcene; β-caryophyllene led 87% of 157 individual-terpene tests, while limonene led 9.6% and β-myrcene led 3.8%, making the lead consistent.¹

Leafly names myrcene as dominant for Animal Face, but lab tests do not match that claim: β-myrcene led 3.8%, compared with 87% for β-caryophyllene.^1,4 The Leaf Magazine claim points to caryophyllene; the tests line up, with β-caryophyllene leading 87%.^1,7

All 157 terpene tests came from Nevada, so the percentages mainly describe Nevada flower rather than a broad state mix.¹

The closest terpene-mix matches for Animal Face are Wedding Cake, Gelato and Gushers: within the 36-strain comparison, their overlaps are 91%, 91% and 91%; Durban Poison, led by terpinolene, is the lowest match at 37%.¹

We convert each strain's median levels for eight terpenes into shares of their total, then compare the shared portion of both mixes; identical mixes score 100.¹ Only strains with at least 30 individual-terpene tests enter this comparison, and Animal Face contributes 157; this is a chemistry comparison, not a prediction of how a strain feels.¹

Animal Face ranks near the top for THC in this dataset: by median total THC, it is 4th of 58 at 24.49%, between LA Kush Cake at 25.39% and G13 at 24.17%; by share at or above 25%, it ranks 4th at 47%.¹

Its middle half is wide: 6.24 points, from 21.20% to 27.44%, ranking 38th by narrowness among 52 strains with at least 30 tests, so results under the Animal Face name vary more than most.¹

Yes: Animal Face shows a wide lab-to-lab THC spread, with medians among 6 labs that had at least 20 tests running from 20.73% at Lab C in Nevada to 30.47% at Lab B in Maryland, a gap of 9.74 points.¹

Labs test different growers' flower, so the gap does not prove a lab reads high; it shows how grower, market and lab can all sit behind the label number. The lab labels are anonymized on this page, with “Lab A” assigned to the lab with the most tests; the downloadable test file names the labs.

Chemically, yes: higher-THC Animal Face carried more total terpenes by weight, with tests at or above 26.84% THC showing a 3.23% median versus 1.92% for tests at or below 23.01%, a terpene-median gap of 1.31 points.¹

The same direction held in 2 of 2 states with at least 30 paired tests: Nevada up and Maryland up.¹ By weight, total terpenes measure aroma compounds; the comparison does not address effects.

No in Nevada, although Animal Face rose overall: across qualifying years, median THC went from 24.51% in 2020 (58 tests) to 29.98% in 2023 (51), for an overall change of +5.47 points.¹

The state-fixed view reverses it: in Nevada, the median moved from 24.51% in 2020 to 19.58% in 2022; the state change was −4.93 points.¹ That means the overall rise is partly about which states supplied enough tests in each year.

We exclude any year below 20 tests.¹

Yes: exact-name Animal Face lab results were mostly flower, with 86% of 401 records in flower and the non-flower records split among shake and trim 12%, other or unrecorded 2.0% and concentrates 0.5%.¹

Only flower enters the figures on this site.

Additional longer-name records totaled 70, 15% of results containing Animal Face, led by “Animal Face x Kush Mints” (30), “TWE Animal Face Infused Pre-Roll Mix” (10) and “Nature's Animal Face” (10).¹ Those added words and product markers can point to different material, so we exclude them under the name rules.

In the 27-market Weedmaps snapshot on Oct 4, 2026, 220 store listings within 50 miles of each market's center carried Animal Face flower, in 17 of the 27 markets; that ranked 17th of 50 tracked strains.²

Median exact-eighth prices were $41.55 in New York (typical other strain: $35.89), $42.00 in Newark (typical other strain: $43.75), $55.00 in Baltimore (typical other strain: $36.25), $45.50 in Chicago (typical other strain: $40.00), $25.00 in Las Vegas (typical other strain: $26.25) and $16.00 in Detroit (typical other strain: $16.00).² Against the typical tracked strain on the same menus, Animal Face was cheaper in 2 of 6 comparable markets, tied in Detroit and pricier in the remaining markets.²